Tag Archives: great articles

The 29th California Women’s Conference

Posted on by NAWRB

Lisa Nichols, Founder of Motivating The Teen Spirit, gives a lively speech before the crowd

The Color Guard by The Sunburst Youth Academy opened the 29th California Women’s Conference with an exciting show at the Long Beach Convention Center. Each year, the conference gathers talented performers, doctors, successful entrepreneurs, and many more to provide an unparalleled experience for attendees. From entertainment, to financial seminars and health talks, the conference had a presentation to interest anyone.

In the past, the California Women’s Conference has hosted notable speakers such as Barbara Walters, First Lady Michelle Obama, his Holiness the Dalai Lama, and Condoleezza Rice. Some of this year’s powerful and inspiring speakers included Arianna Huffington, Rosie Perez, and Ursula Mentjes. The conference—open to both men and women—lasted two full days from morning to night.

Academy Award Nominated actress Rosie Perez responds to interview questions on opeing day

Michelle Patterson, President of the California Women’s Conference (CWC), welcomed attendees after the opening ceremony. Patterson’s theme for the conference was “Better Together” and made it clear that the next coming days would be filled with inspiration, thought-provoking presentations on pressing topics, and lighthearted fun via live concerts.

An extensive amount of exhibitors—106 total—displayed their booths at the convention center as well. The booths ranged from fashion jewelry vendors, teen magazines, universities, and women’s organizations.

Sales and Business Development Expert Ann Marie Houghtailing held multiple presentations throughout the conference regarding finances. Houghtailing created her own successful company involving boutique sales and business development. Since then, she has written a book, spoken at TEDx, and has launched the Institute for Sales and Business Development in partnership with a private university.

Houghtailing’s goal at the conference was to help both men and women achieve financial freedom through analyzing and changing personal behavior. She successfully blended humor with informative financial awareness practices to captivate attendees at the first financial presentation of the day, Disrupting and Dismantling the Five Beliefs that are Compromising your Financial Freedom.

Fitness and Nutrition Expert JJ Virgin stands on stage with her son, Grant Virgin. JJ Virgin was a keynote speaker at the conference

The conference had a unique aspect that attracted people of all ages. Unlike other conferences, a section of each day was devoted to student programs that were produced by young people for young audiences. Topics of these student-themed presentations included 3 Things Every Young Woman Must Know, Flip Your Flaws, Follow Your Dreams, and various performances.

As the presentations came to a close each day, fun events took the stage. Monday night’s festivities started with a wine and cheese reception for V.I.P’s—an excellent way to network while sipping wine and sampling appetizing cheeses. Finally, a concert on the main stage brought people to their feet on both days with a lively party atmosphere. Performers included Grammy-nominated singer Mary Lambert, Nathan Osmond, Sarah Blaine, and Blessid Union of Souls.

As Tuesday night approached, Michelle Patterson and other presenters announced the winners of the online silent auction that was conducted earlier. Prizes varied from categories such as collectibles, technology gadgets, and services although many attendees had their eyes on the trip to the Riviera Maya in Mexico and Los Angeles Angels Experience. The auction and final concert made for a memorable end to the two-day conference.

NAWRB CEO Desirée Patno attended the conference. The following is her personal experience.

CEO and Founder of EmpowerHER.com Michelle King Robson (left) and President of the California Women’s Conference Michelle Patterson (right) pose for a photo at the conference.

“The conference was almost shut down two years ago due to budget cuts. However, private intervention allowed the conference to come to fruition and portray some incredible messages with profound statements from some powerful women. It was definitely well worth the experience and demonstrates that with purpose and direction, true value can be achieved.

Lisa Nichols had a powerful session revealing some of her personal experiences, highlighting differences, and helping the audience to personally improve their own journeys. She emphasized each of her points to the audience with a concluding affirmation of “Yes, Yes.” She chose not one ‘yes’ but a second ‘yes’ to reaffirm and truly anchor her affirmation. I found myself really feeling and absorbing the messages as each one brought new direction and observation.”

The Dodd-Frank Primer

Posted on by NAWRB

It is no doubt that the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is the most comprehensive financial regulatory reform measure to be executed since The Great Depression. While the comprehensive bill consists of sixteen titles, with numerous provisions spelled out over thousands of pages, herein is an attempt to summarize key points, for a broad understanding of how Dodd-Frank relates to those of us participating in the housing economy.

The aim of the legislation is to secure the financial stability of the U.S. financial system by requiring accountability and transparency, to protect taxpayers by eliminating bailouts, to protect consumers from abusive lending practices, to create rules regarding executive compensation, to eliminate loopholes that led to 2008 economic recession, and more.

Financial Stability and Agency Oversight Reform
The numerous government agencies regulating financial institutions had varying standards led to some entities having little or no financial oversight, as compared to their peer financial firms which are classified according to different charters. The Dodd-Frank Act overhauls the existing agency oversight system in an attempt to maintain standards and visibility across all financial institutions and the agencies that govern them.

The Dodd-Frank Act changes the existing regulatory structure by establishing new oversight agencies while combining or eliminating others, to increase transparency of the regulatory process, and also to tighten oversight of specific financial institutions that pose ‘systemic risk’. The changes are purported to create economic stability, while a council was formed to act as a warning system to prevent future crashes.

Securitization Reform
New regulations affect the registration, disclosure, and reporting requirements for asset-backed securities and other structured finance products. Financial institutions are required to absorb more of the credit risk from securitizations, as well as implement accounting changes.

Before Dodd–Frank, investment advisers were not required to register with the SEC if they had less than 15 clients during the previous year, and did not present themselves to the public as an investment adviser. This exemption is now eliminated, thereby rendering numerous investment advisers, hedge funds, and private equity firms subject to the same requirements and larger institutions and investment groups. Certain non-bank financial institutions will be supervised by the Fed in the same manner as if they were a bank holding company.

Derivatives Regulation
Title VII, also known as the Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010, demands a comprehensive regulatory reform on derivatives (derivatives are one of the three main financial instruments, the other two being equities such as stocks, and debt, such as bonds/mortgages). A derivative’s price is dependent upon (derived from) one or more underlying assets; its value is determined by fluctuations in the price of the underlying asset. The most common underlying assets include stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, interest rates and market indexes. Most derivatives, such as futures contracts, forward contracts, options and swaps, are characterized by high leverage, and therefore should be considered to have systemic reach.

Mortgage and Banking
Dodd-Frank has an enormous impact on loan officers and mortgage brokers, requiring that all loan originators must now be licensed, registered, and issued a unique identifier. They are prohibited from charging more than three percent for all loan origination costs, which inhibits the ability of banks to offer mortgages on homes priced below $160,000. Restrictions apply to ensuring that borrowers meet debt-to-income requirements to prevent predatory lending, and interest-only and negative amortization loans are greatly limited.

Other rules were aimed at limiting debit card fees, such as interchange fees, protecting consumers while costing banks billions of dollars in transaction-related fees.

In response to the costs that the legislation places on banks, some banks have ended the practice of giving their customers free checking, and some small banks are no longer able to provide mortgages and car loans. Borrowers now have the ability to sue lenders for misjudging their ability to repay a loan, forcing smaller lenders to exit the mortgage lending market due to increased risk.

Credit Reporting Agencies
The Act established the SEC Office of Credit Ratings, since some credit rating agencies were accused of giving inaccurately positive investment ratings that helped contribute to the financial crisis. The goal of the office is to make certain that agencies provide reliable, accurate credit ratings.

The Volcker Rule
Named after former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, the Volcker Rule was enacted based on the premise that speculative trading played a significant part in the financial crisis. The provision bans banks from making speculative trades with their own money, and limits their activity in certain private funds, as this activity may contribute to systemic risk). Therefore, most US banks are prohibited from proprietary trading, and covered institutions are prohibited from owning, sponsoring or investing in hedge funds or private equity funds.

Investor Protection
Unaware as to how auction rate securities and the secondary securities market functioned, many investors did not see the financial crisis coming. Numerous ponzi schemes were exposed, causing investors to lose millions, and eventually lose faith in those with custody of their funds. The provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act aim to boost investor protection and confidence, hoping to bring investors back to capital markets.

Compensation and Corporate Governance
In response to growing concerns over executive compensation in public companies, specific provisions now require new stock exchange listing and proxy statement standards, and further regulated disclosures for all public companies soliciting proxies or consents. As a result, corporations will have to change the structure of their compensation committees, as well as implement new governance and compensation policies.

Office of Minority and Women Inclusion
The bill establishes an Office of Minority and Women Inclusion that promotes employment and contracting opportunities to address diversity matters. The offices will coordinate technical assistance to minority-owned and women-owned businesses and establish diversity requirements throughout various industries.
Conclusion

There have been mixed reviews regarding the Dodd-Frank Act. Some critics argue that the legislation is too severe, that it limits job opportunities and prevents competition among financial institutions, however, we can perhaps all agree that industry needed oversight, overhaul and accountability.

The Act requires that regulators and oversight committees create 243 rules and conduct 67 studies, many of which are not complete. Therefore, it is premature to attempt to theorize on the efficacy of the legislature until the market begins to correct itself after the new regulations are in effect. You can expect more on the topic in future issues of N Magazine, as the Dodd-Frank Act begins to put down more solid roots in the U.S. economy.

REOMAC 2014 Annual Education Summit and Expo

Posted on by NAWRB

Change, connection, and collaboration were the themes of this year’s spring REOMAC® annual education conference, held at the JW Marriott Desert Springs in Palm Desert, Calif. REOMAC® is a non-profit trade association serving the mortgage default servicing industry nationwide for over twenty-five years.

“REOMAC® has a long tradition of holding conferences in Palm Desert,” said Desirée Patno, CEO and founder of the National Association Women in Real Estate Businesses (NAWRB). “The conference was well-received with very good networking opportunities. The caliber of attendees was very high.”

NAWRB hosted its 3rd Annual Salon Day, prior to the REOMAC kick off, which received rave reviews from participants who enjoyed being pampered while being educated. Kyle Wagoner, of the California Small Business Development Center (SBDC) in Coachella Valley, spoke to the group about various opportunities for free business consulting and low-cost training services (including working with a personal mentor). Wagoner discussed opportunities and provided handouts for attendees to leverage their existing skill sets to expand their business portfolio and grow their business. There’s nothing quite like walking out looking marvelous, including new hairstyles and colors, combined with the increased marketability and focus skill set – the timing was perfect!

Agent training sessions were provided on Sunday by BLB Resources, Green River Capital, Round Point Mortgage, Precision Asset Management, PEMCO, RIO Genesis, iServe Real Estate Operations, Matt Martin Real Estate Management, LRES, Noteschool, Wells Fargo, and Equator to help serve the attendees with direct connection with their clients.

Otis Felton, FDIC’s Corporate University Class Liaison, opened the conference, speaking about his personal and professional journey on overcoming several obstacles to come out stronger than ever. He is extremely happy and thankful for his blessings and gifted us with his words of wisdom.

A REOMAC Speaker veteran, economist Christopher Thornberg, spoke about the market changes for 2014 and beyond. Thornberg gained national recognition after he made accurate predictions in 2006 of the housing crash and recession. Thornberg predicted the housing recovery to rebound by the end of the year, with the possibility of apartment oversupply in some locations. He said that 2013 ended on a strong note, with solid acceleration in the second half as consumers moved past the tax hit. State and local governments were beginning to come around by year-end 2013, and Thornberg said that the weather issues at the beginning of 2014 would have only a temporary effect on the economy. Commercial real estate will continue its slow recovery, and the energy sector will continue to boom. All in all, Thornberg said, 2014 will be better than 2013, but he warned attendees not to get too excited, because future economic challenges include debt-strapped local governments, tight bank credit and mortgage lending, and aging infrastructure. He did state that he expects a three percent growth range in 2014, to be exceeded in 2015, and another real estate market bounce in 2014.

That evening, a charity auction featured sports memorabilia, jewelry, and purses, with bidding wars and exciting wins. Monies from the silent and live auctions benefited the REOMAC® Foundation’s Scholarship Program.

Breakout sessions were held on Tuesday morning, and attendees had time to connect with outside vendors, clients, and future clients. NAWRB member Brandy Nelson, broker and owner of Red Top Realty, Palm Desert, CA, attended two of the breakout sessions. The “Note Sales and the Current Market” session addressed the new practice of banks selling off pools of notes rather than handling individual foreclosures. “It was an informative session,” said Nelson. “I am very interested in learning more about notes.”

Patno served as a panelist in the “Diversity Certification—What It is and How Can It Benefit You” breakout session. “Third party certification gives you accountability and showcases your classification,” said Patno. “It’s an articulation of what you are about, and it’s important to have it on your capability statement and email signature to maximize your available opportunities.” A women-owned business whose work is in the housing economy can certify as a NAWRB Certified Women-Owned Business or Minority Women-Owned Business. The four other federally-recognized diversity certifications include minority-owned, veteran-owned, disabled veteran-owned, and Historically Underutilized Business Zones (HUBzone). Certification qualifies businesses for incentives, programs, and set-asides that would otherwise not be available to them. “It’s well worth the time and energy to get certified,” said Patno. “You want to use the best marketing strategies and practices to quantify what classification is your business, whether you are selling a home, working with other businesses or bidding on contracts.”

Other breakout session topics included “Community Revitalization” as well as “Best Practices for Selling Distressed Properties.” “The Best Practices for Selling Distressed Properties session gave us useful tools for our business,” said Nelson.

Lender/servicer/outsourcer roundtables were also valuable parts of the summit, and relaxing massages were available at the Relaxation Lounge. Vendors at the event used the opportunity to discuss best practices and other helpful topics, while networking with clients.

“The camaraderie and conversations at the summit gave us valuable insights,” said Patno. “Events like these are a necessity to help us unite and learn from each other, so that we are not operating completely as individuals.” We look forward to more REOMAC conferences.

Kyle Wagner, Maria Barrigan, Heidi Robinson, Angelica Suarez, Desirée Patno, Brandy Nelson and Silvia Hernandez.

The Borrower Effect: Impacts & Implications of 2014 Loan Limits

Posted on by NAWRB

The Great Depression left the United States with widespread unemployment and financial collapse. Two million construction workers were out of work. Home mortgages were typically short-term loans that were limited to 50% LTV. In 1934, the National Housing Act created the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) to improve housing conditions and provide a more accessible housing finance system to rejuvenate and stabilize the broader housing finance market that was then only serving borrowers with means. Today’s FHA is still focused on stabilizing the broader housing markets by ensuring that properly documented and qualified borrowers, including those in the low to median income ranges, and in some cases, those adversely affected by and recovering from the recent economic crises, can systematically access affordable mortgage financing, purchase good, safe homes priced at or below the median income.

The end of 2013 marked the expiration of the emergency legislation implemented during the economic crisis from which the US is only now recovering. In similar fashion to the Depression era emergency legislation initially creating the FHA, the Economic Stabilization Act (ESA) of 2008, now expired, and it’s successor, the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) both included provisions to stabilize the broader housing markets when the US housing market had been once again roiled by a severe national economic crises.

ESA increased the national FHA loan ceilings nationwide and allowed the highest cost markets to hold a $729,750 loan limit to maintain housing finance liquidity. Now, the HERA regulations reduce the national loan ceilings in approximately 20% of the more than 3,200 counties for which FHA establishes loan limits, adjusting for median house price corrections and recovering markets. Under HERA, the highest cost markets now have a loan limit of $625,500 – a reduction of $104,250.

Tom Clifford, Branch Manager of New American Funding in Paulsbo, Washington shared, “Yes, we have been affected by the FHA loan limit reductions in Washington State. Our county limits decreased from $475,000.00 to $307,000.00. The larger challenge however, is the drastic increase in the monthly MIP (mortgage insurance premium) making it a monumental challenge for median income homebuyers to afford FHA financing with home prices stabilizing and or increasing.” Clifford goes on say that “Realtors are telling their buyers that FHA financing is not a viable option any longer and steering them away, which has not been the case in years/decades past.”

Nevada Area Sales Manager for New American Funding, Chris Garza, also confirms the lower loan limits “have negatively impacted [Las] Vegas.” In addition to the downward pressure that reduced loan limits are having on the prospective homebuyer’s purchasing power, Garza says that “…Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac having much tougher…credit guidelines,” is also negatively impacting the Nevada market. So let’s unbundle each of these significant changes and the effects they’re having on the housing markets and the borrower’s purchasing power. In both of these high cost markets, the senior mortgage professionals identified three major changes; (1) The HERA implementation lowering the FHA and Conventional (GSE) loan limits; (2) the increased Mortgage Insurance Premiums required to insure the FHA loan product, and (3) the seemingly more restrictive credit environment in which the GSEs are operating.

2014 Loan Limits
On December 6, 2013, HUD announced the new loan limits with the January 1, 2014 effective date. Fortunately, the first-time and affordable homebuyers seeking to purchase homes in markets where the housing costs remain low, did not experience any loan limit changes. Their maximum available loan amounts remained at $271,050.

However, about 652 (20%) of the 3,234 counties for which HUD sets loan limits, will see reductions to their maximum loan amounts as FHA implements the long delayed requirements promulgated by the HERA legislation. These 652 counties are considered “high cost” markets and FHA historically provided for them to have loan limits higher than the median housing price for that county. ESA allowed the ceiling to rise to 125% above median housing price to keep mortgage funds available and sufficient to cover the high house prices created in the advent of the crises. HERA corrects the ceiling in these high-cost markets to 115% of the county’s current median housing price.

It’s important to understand that the emergency legislation deployed through ESA enabled the federal government to fill the housing finance liquidity void created by the mass and abrupt exodus of private sector financing during the U.S. mortgage crisis. Housing is the second largest contributor to our nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), historically comprising 17-20% of GDP and second only to Consumerism, and the federal government could not allow the funding for housing finance to evaporate. This temporary emergency measure was intended to be a short term “plug” and, in 2009 was to be replaced by the more sustainable and permanent HERA, which amended the National Housing Act to tie the FHA’s loan limit “ceiling” and “floor” to the conforming loan limit standard used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

We can see in the graph above, that as a result of HERA, 183 counties across the US now have loan limits that are lower by a whopping $100,000 or greater!

As you might expect, California felt the heaviest impact of HERA, with 54 counties receiving downward adjustments. In contrast, Texas saw 27 counties receive upward adjustments. While California was the largest issuer of FHA Single Family endorsements in 2013, in both dollar volume ($24.7B) and loan count (89.1MM), only 7.7% of those issuances were above the 2014 loan limits.

Nonetheless, reductions of this nature have constrained the purchasing power of borrowers in the impacted markets, causing them to rethink their home buying strategy and possibly even their timing.

The map above provides a visual depiction of the heavily impacted markets.

Note that the concentration of “reds” and “oranges” are along the coastal regions where population density is higher. Typically, the high and highest cost markets are designated as such as they tend to also be higher job producing markets, which create higher density populations, which in turn create higher housing demands. And as we all know, increased housing demands tend to increase house prices.

So why is all of this important for the real estate professionals working across the housing continuum? The job seekers filling the red and orange landscape fit the traditional first time homebuyer profiles for which the FHA program was developed. 2013 was a very strong recovery year for housing prices, with many markets showing strong improvement. And even though some of these high and higher costs markets were hit so severely during this economic crisis, they had risen so high prior to it, that with the reduced loan limits, their current prices are out of reach for the gainfully employed first-time homebuyer. Legitimate homebuyers who managed to save the 3-3.5% required to buy their entry level home were also located in those 183 counties who’s loan limits were reduced by $100,000 or more. Where do they now derive the additional funds to fill the down payment gap created by the reduced loan limits?

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reports that in a normal market environment, first-time homebuyers consummate 40% of home sales. By the end of 2013, NAR reported that only 28% of the home sales were to first time homebuyers!

At upwards of 80%, the GSEs and FHA remain the main sources of housing funding. While it’s important to enact the requirements of any final piece of legislation, would it have been truly detrimental to have enacted these particular requirements/corrections in phases? Especially, since it had already been completely delayed 5 years past its legislated enactment date.

Brainpower and models much larger and more intense than ours evaluated these changes and made the decision to move forward on all fronts in one swooping, market pervasive move. With the overall economic recovery still progressing very slowly, the recovery in the housing sector still far from “full-steam-ahead”, and the prevailing lack of meaningful private financing, one begins to wonder. Is it possible that all three agencies are repressing “bubble” fears?

Come back next month to get our perspective on drivers and impacts of FHA’s higher MIP and the increasingly “intense” credit mindset in the conventional loan arena.

—

Ingrid Beckles
Founder & CEO of The Beckles Collective, LLC
NAWRB’s Regulatory & Policy Chair
ibeckles@thebecklescollective.com

 

 

Policy Prescriptions to Assist Women Entrepreneurs

Posted on by Ann Sullivan

Does the name Alice Paul ring a bell? Alice Paul led the effort to give women the right to vote. She raised money for the cause, led a group of White House protesters known as the Silent Sentinels, was imprisoned three times, force-fed raw eggs when she staged a hunger strike, and kept the pressure on President Wilson to support ratification of the 19th Amendment. She was all of these things, but above all else, she was a fierce advocate on behalf of women.

Today, hunger strikes or stage protests to stop traffic are less common, but we do raise money and we do advocate for the advancement of women-owned businesses. Having just celebrated Women’s History Month, the following are policy changes that will enhance the growth of women owned businesses.

Strengthen Counseling for Women Business Owners.

There are 106 Women Business Centers (WBCs) across the country that counsel and train more than 137,000 entrepreneurs and aspiring entrepreneurs annually, creating 700 new businesses a year at a cost of $122 per person. Last year, WBCs outperformed their goals by 18% and enjoy high customer satisfaction ratings. With the success of these women business centers, Congress should invest in more funding to establish additional centers and to boost the ones currently in existence. The centers are required to match these federal grants by raising matching funds from other sources, but with $14 million in federal money for the whole program they are boot strapped. Women deserve better.

In addition, other entrepreneurial training and counseling programs operated by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) should be given priority when it comes to funding. Programs such as the Program for Investment in Microentrepreneurs (PRIME) are critical pieces of the puzzle when it comes to supporting women entrepreneurs with the skills needed to successfully run a business. Studies show that these investments pay off. According to the Association for Enterprise Opportunity’s (AEO) most recent report, Bigger than you Think: The Power or
Microbusiness in the United States, businesses that receive training have higher success rates (88% are still in business after five years, compared to a 50% success rate for businesses that do not) and have average annual revenues 38% higher.

Similarly, the Department of Labor (DOL) should encourage entrepreneurship as a viable job strategy. The DOL oversees a national network of job training centers, which are allowed to provide entrepreneurial training to unemployed individuals interested in starting a business – thus creating a job for themselves. However, a barrier exists that prohibits these centers from counting people starting a business as a “successful employment outcome,” and discourages these centers from providing entrepreneurial training. The DOL should change their performance metrics to accept a business startup as a successful employment outcome.

Increase Capital Access for Women-owned Businesses.

Women entrepreneurs continue to struggle to access capital to start or grow a business. According to Women Impacting Public Policy’s (WIPP) most recent annual member survey, women make an average of two attempts to access capital, securing a loan only 60% of the time.

The SBA operates a number of loan programs essential to women-owned small businesses: the 7(a) loan program, the Microloan Program, and the 504 commercial real estate loan program. These programs are supported by federal funding, meaning any decrease in funding reduces their ability to make loans. Congress should ensure adequate funding in order to meet the demands of women-owned businesses.

The advent of online crowdfunding is another recent development and step in the right direction, allowing businesses to raise up to $1 million. However, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) threatens to derail it from taking off with burdensome compliance and reporting requirements. The SEC should ensure these costs stay at a minimum to allow this innovative model to take off.

Bring Women to the International Marketplace.

March 8th was International Women’s Day — a good reminder that expanding U.S. women’s business presence abroad through exporting should be a top priority. Many women business owners limit themselves to selling domestically because the international market is too daunting. A simpler, streamlined exporting process, one focused on getting our products abroad, would help. The dividends are significant: women-owned businesses that exported have on average more than 100 times the total annual receipts, five times as many employees, and more than triple the receipts per employee than those only selling domestically. WIPP operates an export education platform, ExportNOW focused on encouraging more women entrepreneurs to engage within the global marketplace to increase their success.

Bring Parity to the Women’s Federal Contracting Program.

The U.S. federal government is the world’s largest consumer —spending more than half a trillion dollars annually. You may be surprised to know that the goal — not mandate — for federal agencies to buy from women-owned companies is 5%;and the government has never met it. The Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) procurement program, designed to ensure the mandate is met, does not have parity with other contracting programs. There are some bills to combat this in Congress — though none have been a priority for the leadership. That seems to be what the suffragettes fought for — parity. So why are we fighting for this 100 years later?

The histories of women like Alice Paul, and the countless other Suffragettes, serve as reminders of how hard we have fought to achieve the present. But more work needs to be done. To quote Alice Paul, “When you put your hand to the plow, you can’t put it down until you get to the end of the row.” We won’t.

—

Ann Sullivan
WIPP Government Relations
1156 15th Street, NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
202-626-8528

 

Diversity in the Housing Market

Posted on by NAWRB

 

Diversity in the housing market is a broad topic, and one with many avenues to venture down. There is a range of buyers and sellers and there always will be. Further, there are an equal number of products for those same buyers/sellers as well. Over the last few years it went from homeowners to banks, investors, foreigners and it is beginning to circle back to homeowners.

Reflecting back on the most recent U.S.Census Bureau State and County Quick Facts data, one can immediately notice diversity, from the various ethnicities, age makeups, and types of homes being owned. This is by far the most widely assumed diversity today within the American melting pot. Most notably though is the homeownership rate. Why is this important? Homeownership has always been the driving force within the U.S. economy, but over the last few years the housing market has been impacted dramatically, as well as the households that participated during the run up to the housing crash. We saw many short sales, foreclosures, and REOs; the resulting effect was many displaced households forced to enter into the rental market.

Those forced households were in a state of credit repair for the last few years. We are now seeing those same homeowners re-entering the housing market. Their attitudes on financing are completely different, as well as their choice of home; people are now living within their means. Competing against these displaced persons are the younger generations in their twenties and thirties beginning their careers and looking to buy their first home. With scarce inventories of homes an increased demand for new housing has arisen and the new trend shows that first time buyers are from the younger generations. These demographics favor higher-end lofts, condos, and townhomes over the traditional single-family residences.

There are plenty of examples of these high-end properties in the Los Angeles area, and the model is slowly working its way out to the Inland Empire. In Los Angeles there are the Ritz-Carlton Residences, the Wilshire Coronado, and 432 Oakhurst set to open in the summer. Most of these communities offer gym facilities, pools, pet amenities, and social activities for residents to interact with one another. In the Inland Empire Lewis Development Corporation built Santa
Barbara in Rancho Cucamonga.

Within the Inland Empire we are seeing homebuilders build again, and this is a positive sign for the area. A unique finding came from The Urban Land Institute’s (ULI) report on Emerging Trends In Real Estate 2014, “…interest in development is up in 2014, and it isn’t the multifamily sector, that lands at the top of the list. Industrial development is where respondents feel the best opportunities exist for development in 2014.” The Inland Empire has long been a hub for industrial warehousing and this amplified emphasis on industrial could spell improved demand for housing starts. Well-known Inland Empire economist John Husing estimated an increase in housing starts of 6,442, up from 4,737.

The Inland Empire is comprised mainly of blue-collar workers, and a potential industrial spike will likely increase blue-collar jobs. In John Husing’s same presentation he highlighted that manufacturing could be a major growth source for the Inland Empire. This in turn will attract more workers, and as a result increase the demand for housing. With the median wage for manufacturing sectors between $40,000-$55,000, and using the industry standard that a mortgage payment should not represent more than 35 percent of monthly wages, the higher quartile of blue-collar workers qualify for a $225,000 dollar home, with a 3.5 percent down payment. What the above figure describes is a need for moderately priced housing.

Another facet to the home buying market is the entrance of the female consumer. In an Urban Land Institute (ULI) report titled, Resident Futures, the researchers noted young women in their twenties are buying houses at twice the rate of males. More women are entering the housing market, and their needs, wants, and desires are driving a fresh approach on new communities. An MSN story highlighted the following eleven demands of women buyers: big closets, jetted bathtubs, location, security, a great place for socializing, dedicated laundry room, low maintenance, separate shower and tub combination, two-car garage, great kitchen, and a smart layout. With no signs of slowing, the woman consumer is one that the housing industry will be heeding in their housing concepts.

Fostering more housing diversity is the Baby Boomers. The Baby Boom generation was born between 1946-1964, with roughly 4 million born every year from 1954-1964 making up 40 percent of the US population, and is one of the largest groups in the United States. At the date of this publishing the youngest Baby Boomer is 49 years old. As the enormous population of Boomers ages, their need for adequate housing will be stressed. Signs of these developments are already in place as more new homes include a downstairs suite complete with separate bedroom, bathroom, and entrance.

Real estate is extremely fragmented and no two geographic areas or communities are the same. Though some basics remain constant, the consumer in 2014 is very diverse and has a different outlook on what a home should be. Scared from the 2008 housing crash and subsequent recession, the consumer is very cautious and more financially aware. Moreover as the Baby Boomers continue to age their impact in the local markets will also drive change and product types in the housing market. The world will continue to shrink as well, and as people immigrate and emigrate to and from areas, the local real estate markets will evolve to reflect these changes. Diversity is inevitable, and the real estate industry is evolving to accommodate and embrace these changes.

—

Scott Kueny
Strategic Business Partner
Ticor Title Company
www.ticoroc.com

 

 

In Which Dimension is Credit Constrained?

Posted on by Mark Fleming

The year 2014 is sure to be another eventful one in mortgage finance. A litany of new regulations are prepared to be implemented, the economy is projected to improve, driving mortgage rates higher, and demand to refinance loans is expected to decline further. The overall size of the mortgage market, in dollar terms, is anticipated to be significantly smaller than in 2013. In light of these market conditions, one of the most discussed issues right now is the availability of credit for mortgage borrowers – is mortgage credit availability too tight? The importance of this question cannot be understated, particularly because of the impending implementation of the Qualified Mortgage (QM) standard and the mortgage market’s determination of the types of credit it will offer to borrowers.

Whether credit is too tight or too loose is an especially hard question to answer because there is no one single measure of credit availability. Nonetheless, it is possible to look at a variety of measures that collectively influence a borrower’s access to credit: borrower credit worthiness, loan-to-value (LTV) ratios, debt-to-income (DTI) ratios, the level of documentation, the propensity of adjustable rate (ARM) loans and the share of purchase-money loans.

To answer the question of whether each of these credit measures is too loose or too tight requires a determination of what would constitute a “normal” level of availability. For example, the average credit score of all originated first-lien purchase loans in October 2013 was 749. The average credit score over the year before the Federal Reserve announcement encouraging the use of ARMS in February 2004, and subsequently raising the federal funds rate, was 710. In percentage terms, this is only a 5-percent difference. The average doesn’t show us that the share of originated first-lien purchase loans in October 2013 with credit scores below 620 (typically ineligible under GSE guidelines) was 0.3 percent, but averaged 29 percent over the year before the Fed announcement. Credit to borrowers with low FICO scores was normally available prior to the beginning of the housing boom (as marked by the Fed announcement), but clearly is not currently. For each measure of credit availability, it is much more insightful to compare the share of the riskiest subset of the entire measure’s distribution to that same share prior to the housing bubble. Credit availability in each measure represents the extent to which lenders originate loans to the riskier subset of the distribution.

In the chart, each axis represents a different measure of credit availability. The inner hexagon crosses each axis at a value of 100, which is the reference point for the normal value for the measure illustrated on that axis, based on the average over the year preceding the Fed announcement in February 2004. For example, as described above, the share of first-lien purchase loans in October 2013 with credit scores below 620 was 0.3 percent, but averaged 29 percent over the year before the Fed announcement. Therefore, relative to a normal share of 29 percent, indexed to 100 and represented in the “normal” hexagon, the “current” unbalanced hexagon clearly shows the constrained availability of credit to low credit score borrowers. For each measure, the “current” and “maximum” unbalanced hexagons represent the deviation from normal for each measure both currently and at the loosest since the start of the housing bubble, respectively.

Immediately apparent from this chart is that credit availability is tight for two important underwriting criteria – credit scores and documentation levels. Low-credit-score loans are not being originated relative to the height of the expansion of credit or even at the normalized level of availability. Additionally, access to no- and low-documentation loans is significantly constrained relative to the height of expanded credit or the normalized level of availability. Underwriting eligibility in the current market requires good credit and the ability to fully document your loan.

Also interesting to note is that the shares of high-LTV and DTI lending are very close to normal. Both measures expanded availability during the housing boom. High-LTV lending currently remains modestly loose relative to normal and high-DTI lending is modestly tight relative to normal. The share of ARM loans being originated is currently much more restricted than normal, as many subprime ARM loan products are no longer available.

Looking at the share of the riskiest subset of an entire measure’s distribution compared to the share prior to the housing bubble for multiple measures gives more insight into the answer to the pressing question of whether credit is too loose or too tight. Right now, credit is tight for low credit score borrowers, those who don’t want to or can’t fully document their loans, or who would like an ARM product. For many, the choice to document or select an ARM product is not necessarily an impediment to credit availability, but for those with low credit scores there are fewer options.

—

 

Mark Fleming
Chief Economist
CoreLogic
www.corelogic.com

 

New Program Offers Peer Support for Women

Posted on by NAWRB

It has long been said that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. At City of Hope, researchers are implementing this concept of imitation—of making one thing similar to another—in a leading-edge approach to treating difficult cancers.

City of Hope’s new chief of surgery and an enthusiastic researcher, Yuman Fong, M.D., has been developing a therapy that essentially makes resistant breast cancer respond like thyroid cancer, which is cured in 90 percent of patients.

Triple-negative breast cancer—named for its lack of three important receptors that can be targeted with common, effective therapies—remains a challenge for women, as well as for the oncologists who care for them. Fong is energized by this challenge and the promise of discovery. “If we can find something that can kill [these types of] cancer cells, it would be a big breakthrough for the field,” he says.

Fong has been developing a new approach to treating triple-negative breast cancer by starting with what he knows and loves: viral therapy. He has long studied how viruses can kill cancer. Happily, his expertise in viruses and affinity to the challenge of treatment-resistant cancers is a good fit.
Continue reading →

How Businesses Can Incorporate the Sharing Economy for Higher Success

Posted on by NAWRB

If you’re not already aware, the sharing economy is picking up speed. The sharing economy is a peer-to-exchange of goods and services, in which citizens rent or share resources. Companies involved in the sharing economy include Airbnb—where a host rents out part of his or her home to someone looking for a temporary place to stay. Companies like this are growing in size and it would bode well for business owners to adopt some of these characteristics in order to increase the chances of being successful.

A huge reason as to why companies within the sharing economy are so successful is because they are all about the customer experience. These companies bring an interpersonal connection so that all parties involved feel connected. For example, with the company Lyft—a service much like a taxi except the drivers use their own car—the service is able to create a more personal experience by offering the rider to sit in the front seat, next to the driver. This makes the ride seem less like the customer is being chauffeured around, and more like they’re being picked up by a friend.
Continue reading →

Exercise: Tackle Your Busy Schedule With Renewed Energy

Posted on by NAWRB

Being a successful woman in the real estate industry means your days are most likely hectic and stressful. The last thing you probably want to do is go to the gym. If you can motivate yourself to go, you may end up on the treadmill the entire time because the weight area intimidates you and/or you’re scared to ask questions. Sure, you look and feel great in your designer power suit, but that feeling can quickly melt away once the suit comes off.

Now many of you know that you should use weights to reap maximum benefits for your body but perhaps you’re too busy to learn the right exercises. Or, maybe you’re against weights because you believe you’ll bulk up like one of those bodybuilders. This is where a personal trainer comes in.

Because the real estate business can be exhausting, hiring a personal trainer who’s experienced enough to know how to design customized workout routines can be just what you need. This can maximize your exercise results and help keep your heart rate up throughout your entire workout. It can also help you burn a great deal of fat, while sculpting your body.
Continue reading →